Rate Your Package

We would fully appreciate all your feedback/suggestions to improve everything here at Advertise Hotspot. The way to get better is to hear it all from you! So, if you could take some time, and fill out the following, it will mean so much to us!

Code:

[b]Forum Name:[/b]
[b]Forum URL:[/b]
[b]Packager's Name:[/b]
[b]Package Request URL:[/b]
[b]Rating:[/b] (10/10)
[b]What Was Good:[/b]
[b]What Was Bad:[/b]

Thank you for your time!

**This whole thing was a suggestion from Lunar!

Well, I guess since I suggested it, it’s fitting that I go first, hehe.

Forum Name: Night Dreams
Forum URL: http://www.nightdreams.org/
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/luxury-package-please-t2209.htm#22471
Rating: 4/10
What Was Good: There were no one word posts and the grammar and spelling wasn’t horrible. It took about a week to get all the posts finished, which was actually how long I was hoping it would hold out. Also, there was no posting in the fun/games section that we have.
What Was Bad: I first ran into some problems with the start of the package. It got tagged the day I requested it and then I had to wait two days until I heard from the tagging packager again and that was to be asked if I still wanted the package. I hadn’t said that I no longer wanted it; I had simply been waiting for it to start. So, the time between tagging and the start of the package needs to be worked on.

I had a problem with posts being within the intro thread that was created by the packager. One post for the actual intro is fine--though, that should just be a given with a package in my opinion--but to go back and post in it to respond to those who have greeted you and to then count that as posts for the package is annoying. It’s a wasted two posts in my opinion.

I also didn’t appreciate having an advertisement put up in our Promo section count as a post. Yes, that section is there for promoting your site, but I’m not going to hiring you promote your site. I don’t think that should have been added to the post count either. It’s like being jipped out of another post. There are plenty of other advertising forums out there that you can advertise on; you shouldn’t do it when you’re doing your job.

Making a post in a “Going Away” section also shouldn’t be counted as a post. If you’re not going to be able to post for the package for a couple of days, say so on the forum that you requested it. Most people that request packages don’t want their members to know their requesting packages. Also, to have that count toward another post, again, is a waste.

My last suggestion would be not to make a post that is supposed to help boost post count and activity of a forum, in a thread that already has over a thousand posts in it. It really doesn’t make sense because obviously that thread is already a popular one and doesn’t really need any more activity.

So, those are my suggestions and comments. If I, by chance, offended anyone, I’m sorry; I didn’t mean to. I’m just pointing out what I believed to be mistakes that were made to help improve the service.

I hope you don't mind Joel, I added "Packager's Name" to your format. Remove it if you like. Lunar, you made some very good points there. Myself wouldn't car less as long as I get some activity on my forum, hehe. When you are talking about the thread with over 1000 posts, what thread is that?

Bob wrote:Myself wouldn't car less as long as I get some activity on my forum, hehe.

Well, when I'm paying for something to get done, I want quality.

Bob wrote:When you are talking about the thread with over 1000 posts, what thread is that?

It's a thread on my site that has over a thousand posts on it. What I'm saying is, if there is a thread with that many posts, there really shouldn't be one added onto it. That post could/should be used for a thread that, perhaps, doesn't have many posts.

@Bob, thanks for that too

Lunar, a great one by you! Thanks for the great suggestion! We'll try to improve on the time taken to complete packages and also look on further to the stuffs you pointed out!

In what way did i give away i was a packager for you.

Forum Name:The Forums
Forum URL: http://theforums.info
Packager's Name: Austin
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/luxury-package-t2554.htm
Rating: (10/10) 10/10
What Was Good: Him posting.
What Was Bad: Nothing

Honestly, he did his job, that's all I care about.

Great to hear that Fusious.

Package: 9.5/10

Forum Name: extra time
Forum URL: http://extratimeforum.net
Packager's Name: Joel
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/luxury-package-t2739.htm
Rating: (10/10) 9.5/10
What Was Good:Great package! Thanks for saying i should get a reward or something like that joel, that was very nice of you.
What Was Bad: The only con is I wish more of the posts were in the football sections,but that's a small con and altogether it was a great service! thanks!

aragorn wrote:Package: 9.5/10

Forum Name: extra time
Forum URL: http://extratimeforum.net
Packager's Name: Joel
Package Request URL:
Rating: (10/10) 9.5/10
What Was Good:Great package! Thanks for saying i should get a reward or something like that joel, that was very nice of you.
What Was Bad: The only con is I wish more of the posts were in the football sections,but that's a small con and altogether it was a great service! thanks!

This was my forum but aragorn requested the package for it.

Thanks Joel, it was a fairly good package.

Thanks and great to hear that guys!

Also, you done the package pretty quick, so that was a bonus too

Forum Name: Extra Time
Forum URL: http://ExtraTimeForum.net/
Packager's Name: Austin
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/luxury-t2846.htm
Rating: 6/10
What Was Good: Good spelling and grammar, and a fairly quick package.
What Was Bad: Most of the posts were in the off topic sections.

Sorry, i tried to post in all the forums containing football but i dont really know that much about it, other than USA soccer.

Forum Name: General Chat
Forum URL: http://generalchat.forumotion.com
Packager's Name: Joel/Bob
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/gold-package-please-t2904.htm#35152
Rating: (10/10) 10/10
What Was Good:
What Was Bad:


Thanks for the service. I will be glad to promote and signup for a package again

Great to hear! Thanks for rating your package!

Forum Name: InvestComics™ Forum
Forum URL: http://investcomics.com/forum/index.php
Packager's Name: micro1000
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/investcomics-forum-t3022.htm#35876
Rating: (10/10) 10/10
What Was Good: I found micro1000's posting to be really great! His conversing with me in the WWE thread was an enjoyable time. He even gave out some feedback and a suggestion. Which is something I really appreciated. And I know that more then likely, I will be requesting this service again.
What Was Bad: Can't really think of anything bad. Other then the fact his time there was really short!

Thanks for rating your package.
Next time ill try to stay there a bit longer.

No prob! And that would be cool!

Great to hear that WeaponX

Forum Name: Spiriomon Community
Forum URL: http://spiriomon.info/forum
Packager's Name: Nik and 50Cent
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/spiriomon-forums-t3112.htm
Rating: 10/10
What Was Good: I actually got 3 members from the request... 50Cent, joel, and nick all joined... plus I got some posts
What Was Bad: Nothing bad. Went just as I wanted =D

Frosverup wrote:Forum Name: Spiriomon Community
Forum URL: http://spiriomon.info/forum
Packager's Name: Nik and 50Cent
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/spiriomon-forums-t3112.htm
Rating: 10/10
What Was Good: I actually got 3 members from the request... 50Cent, joel, and nick all joined... plus I got some posts
What Was Bad: Nothing bad. Went just as I wanted =D

Thanks for the feedback! Good to hear from you.!

Forum Name: TheForums
Forum URL: theforumsng.net
Packager's Name: 50cent, Nik
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/luxury-package-t3212.htm
Rating: (10/10) 8/10
What Was Good: They got it done
What Was Bad: The fact that the original "Packager" can't do his job completely :/
I just think that's not good.

What do you mean cant do?

Because he stopped at 17 posts and 50cent completed the rest of my package.

Oh well we are thinking of making two packagers to finish the luxury one.

Ah alright. Then nothing was bad here (:

Thank you for your feedback Fusious!

Forum Name: InvestComics™ Forum
Forum URL: http://investcomics.com/forum/index.php
Packager's Name: Micro1000 and 50Cent
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/investcomics-forum-t3204.htm
Rating: (10/10) 8 out of 10.
What Was Good: I liked that I wound up having two members from here doing the package.
What Was Bad: While it was nice having 2 members doing the package. It felt like it was a rather quick thing. But it is a fault on my part as well for not saying to take it slow.

Forum Name: Spiriomon Forus
Forum URL: http://spiriomon.info/forum
Packager's Name: micro1000
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/luxury-please-t3338.htm
Rating: 10/10
What Was Good: all da posts it got meh =D
What Was Bad: nothing went bad

Weapon X wrote:Forum Name: InvestComics Forum
Forum URL: http://investcomics.com/forum/index.php
Packager's Name: Micro1000 and 50Cent
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/investcomics-forum-t3204.htm
Rating: (10/10) 8 out of 10.
What Was Good: I liked that I wound up having two members from here doing the package.
What Was Bad: While it was nice having 2 members doing the package. It felt like it was a rather quick thing. But it is a fault on my part as well for not saying to take it slow.

Frosverup wrote:Forum Name: Spiriomon Forus
Forum URL: http://spiriomon.info/forum
Packager's Name: micro1000
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/luxury-please-t3338.htm
Rating: 10/10
What Was Good: all da posts it got meh =D
What Was Bad: nothing went bad

Thank you for your valuable feedback~!

thanks for your feedback

Forum Name: Social Island
Forum URL: http://social-island.co.cc
Packager's Name: Nik
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/luxury-for-si-t3529.htm
Rating: 4/10
What Was Good: I don't have a lot of good feedback. There was no one word post's and the grammar was good.
What Was Bad: I found a good amount of 2 word posts, it was like a 20 minute package and i would rather a few hour's at minimum. Replying to an intro thread by saying thank's should not be counted.

It was bad.... Sorry.

...I spent an hour doing it. I have now just given you a free extra post. And about three posts is a good amount?

...Anyway thanks for the feedback. ;p

Forum Name: WutIsThis - Forums
Forum URL: www.forums.wutisthis.net
Packager's Name: Oscarg and Nik
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/luxury-package-t3590-15.htm
Rating: (7/10)
What Was Good: It was fast, and they were pretty good posts.
What Was Bad: The quality could've been a little better, and more threads.

Thank you, I might use this service again!

Sorry, i couldn't think of anymore threads, most of the ones i though of were there. xD
Anyway, thanks for the feedback America!

I did try some threads but all what I mostly knew was already on the forum. I'll try better next time though.

Forum Name: Purely Review
Forum URL: www.purelyreview.com
Packager's Name: Micro1000
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/gold-please-purelyreview-t3588.htm#40998
Rating: 10/10
What Was Good: The posts were good, fine length.
What Was Bad: Nothing really.
Thank you

Thank you for your time Daisy.

Thanks for the feedback.

Forum Name: Gamer's Unity
Forum URL: http://gamerunity.co.cc
Packager's Name: oscarg
Packager Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/gold-package-please-t3690.htm
Rating: 10/10
What Was Good: Alot of good posts! I love how he helped fill in my empty forums.. I was very pleased! ^-^
What Was Bad: Nothing!

Thank you very much!

SubterraMaster wrote:Forum Name: Gamer's Unity
Forum URL: http://gamerunity.co.cc
Packager's Name: oscarg
Packager Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/gold-package-please-t3690.htm
Rating: 10/10
What Was Good: Alot of good posts! I love how he helped fill in my empty forums.. I was very pleased! ^-^
What Was Bad: Nothing!

Thank you very much!

Glad you liked the package. For such good feedback I'll go back and do another couple of posts for ya.

Forum Name: Advertise it
Forum URL: http://www.advertiseitforums.com
Packager's Name: Oscarg
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/completed-rejected-packages-f25/package-for-me-again-d-t3720.htm#41801
Rating: 10
What Was Good: Great package. fast and good posts
What Was Bad: nothin apart from i cant request him to do another one for a while

Great to hear that Martin! Oscar is our new packager by the way!

I'll still go to the forum Martin, but I won't post as much and as quick. Your general discussion forum interested me.

And thanks for the feedback.

Forum Name: Flozen
Forum URL: http://flozen.org
Packager's Name: Joel and themisd
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/flozenorg-luxury-package-please-t3812.htm#42973
Rating: 10/10
What Was Good: it was great. Some quality posts and topics!
What Was Bad: Nothing really!

Thanks dude

No problem!

Forum Name: Ninja Legends
Forum URL: http://ninja-legends.darkbb.com/forum.htm
Packager's Name: Nik
Package Request URL: http://www.advertisehotspot.com/packages-f32/ninja-legends-completed-ac-t3857.htm
Rating: 10/10
What Was Good: 19 posts, kick-started activity lol
What Was Bad: Nothing xD

Thanks for the feedback.